BAD COPS

Police Chief Whitlock

THE MONSTER OF COWETA COUNTY

Lies – Abuse of Authority – Bully – Fabricate Crimes – Incompetent – Not fit for Office

16-10-23. Impersonating a public officer or employee

A person who falsely holds himself out as a peace officer or other public officer or employee with intent to mislead another into believing that he is actually such officer commits the offense of impersonating an officer and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by a fine of not more than $1,000.00 or by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than five years

Confession to GBI about the crime. Police Impersonator set up by Chief Whitlock

Bullied 55 yr old female and her 80 yr old mother: 911 was called on the Chief!

Victim of being bullied and abuse of authority

Only a Monster would interfere with a 80 year old women from using the bathroom!

How many of you have elderly mothers or grandmothers and would find Whitlock’s treatment of these women DISGUSTING?

Victim of a bully, calling 911. The police chief can abuse his authority, but citizens do the same act and he gives them a citation.
At the end (6:32 minute mark) a cop yells at the 80 year old women to stay in the car when she is trying to use the bathroom.
None of the other drivers received citation but the one who called and reported Whitlock to 911. Why her? RETALIATION!

Chief of police using emergency lights to drive down shoulder of the road to avoid a traffic jam with his wife in the city vehicle on a Saturday. When confronted he gives a women a ticket.

Using tax payer money (cost of gas) to conduct personal business. Is this theft by conversion?

Evidence Tampering

§ 16-10-94. Tampering With Evidence

Universal Citation: GA Code § 16-10-94 (2020)

  1. A person commits the offense of tampering with evidence when, with the intent to prevent the apprehension or cause the wrongful apprehension of any person or to obstruct the prosecution or defense of any person, he knowingly destroys, alters, conceals, or disguises physical evidence or makes, devises, prepares, or plants false evidence.

The District Attorney didn’t have this evidence to determine if a law enforcement investigation was warranted! Whitlock prevented the DA’s office from getting it.

Stalking and Harassment Under the Color of Law

Georgia Code Title 16. Crimes and Offenses § 16-5-90 (a)(1) A person commits the offense of stalking when he or she follows, places under surveillance, or contacts another person at or about a place or places without the consent of the other person for the purpose of harassing and intimidating the other person. 

Second incident Chief Whitlock harassed a friend
CHIEF WHITLOCK FOLLOWING A FAMILY FRIEND AND BELOW IS THE CHIEF FOLLOWING HER ONTO THE INTERSTATE.
I CAUGHT CHIEF WHITLOCK HAVING ME FOLLOWED AND HARASSED.

Lies

§ 16-10-20. A person who knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact; makes a false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or makes or uses any false writing or document, knowing the same to contain any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry, in any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of state government or of the government of any county, city, or other political subdivision of this state.

The Chief stated in a written response to an Open Records Act request he did not have a written calendar

More lies

Chief Whitlock through the City Attorney claims they had not received any citizens complaints. LIAR… see below, a citizens complaint he kept from me.
THIS IS A DIRECT RELEASE FROM AN AGENT AND NOT AN OPEN RECORDS REQUEST. He doesn’t want people to know he is being treated special.

If you or I lied to the Georgia Bureau of Investigation and the investigator for the Peace Officers Standards & Training Agency we would be in jail at this moment or at least be removed as a certified police officer.

Whitlock did not provide any proof of officers calling out sick that day and city stated there are no records of officers calling in sick that day!

The on-duty officer taking this picture is the one they claim called in sick that day! The city manger confirmed this in an email (the email was written before they become aware of the photos)

Witnesses: GBI Agent Dockins & Agent Thompson

If what Whitlock says is true, he has been unable to provide the copies of each signed letter sent to the individual officers authorizing them to work this off-duty assignment using police equipment, city paid fuel and uniforms as required by law. Failure to comply is a misdemeanor for each officer who worked.

According to the city, these letters do not exist!

GA Code 16-10-3:

Nothing contained within this Code section shall be deemed or construed so as to prohibit any law enforcement officer of the state or any political subdivision thereof:

  1. From being employed by private persons, firms, or corporations during his off-duty hours when such employment is approved in writing by the chief or head, or his duly designated agent, of the law enforcement agency by which such law enforcement officer is employed;

The Grantville City Charter states the permit holder will submit as part of their security plan A specific plan for internal security for the festival, specifying the number of off-duty law enforcement personnel which the applicant plans to hire. The internal security plan must show that all off-duty law enforcement personnel to be used for internal security are POST-certified and have jurisdictional authority in the festival area. The names of the officers hired must have been provided to the city or how else would the city know the “off-duty” officers complied with the permit requirements?? Whitlock either hid this information from GBI or he is just incompetent.

Whitlock lied and then told Channel 2 news reporter Justin Gray he would do it again! Why can’t he just obey the law and his oath of office?

Below is a lies and the admission he intentionally violated GA Code 16-10-30

Whitlock planted a non officer to make it appear to the production company they were getting the officers they paid for and mislead the production company and citizens passing by the impersonator’s location.

A person who falsely holds himself out as a peace officer or other public officer or employee with intent to mislead another into believing that he is actually such officer

The officer could not see the impersonator as Whitlock told the GBI agents.

BELOW: Can you see the next intersection from this up hill location where the impersonator was located?

If you or I lied to the Georgia Attorney General’s office, we would be indicted and in jail. Why not Police Chief Whitlock?

BELOW: Response letter from that Whitlock sent to the AG’s office about my complaint against him. AN INVESTIGATION WAS NEVER CONDUCTED. Whitlock needed to use the excuse of an investigation to legally keep records away from me.

BELOW: District Attorney’s statement to me about my complaint to him. The DA clearly states there has been no investigation started in the matter. Therefore, the records are not exempt from the public.

In my opinion, Police Chief Whitlock lied to the GBI to prevent a full criminal investigation into his activities

Police Chief lied to the city council and told them his department could not earn a law enforcement certification because the police department’s building is too old!

Federal Lawsuit to Expose all the bad acts from this Police Chief

This fabricated statement was used to try to indict me. These misfits didn’t know about case law ” Smith vs. City of Cumming”

An officer or employee of the state or any political subdivision thereof or other person authorized by law to make or give a certificate or other writing who knowingly makes and delivers such a certificate or writing containing any statement which he knows to be false shall, upon conviction thereof, be punished by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than five years.

City Council Member Sells explains why they need to to try and indict me so badly. It was all about protecting staff from being exposed!

NO protection for citizens from tyrants in the government. Wow!

Police Chief Whitlock unethical behavior strikes again

BELOW: Whitlock had the City Manager pay the Pastor by altering official government records and against the city council vote

In April 2023, Chief Whitlock allows the same pastor and his church not follow the city special permit terms, saving the pastor thousands of dollars. What is in it for the chief?

  1. The permit application approved by the city council stated certified officer would be hired off duty by the permit holder for security.
  2. City charter states a security plan must be submitted for the provision of security for public safety.  No security plan was submitted.
  3. City Charter states the purpose of the ordinance is to protect local citizens and their property.
  4. A special event shall be limited to the specific geographic area within which the event is to take place and the producer of a special event shall be responsible for the provision of off-duty police or other law enforcement officers. The only document provided was a map with the specific geographic area nothing else submitted.
  5. A specific plan for internal security for the festival, specifying the number of off-duty law enforcement personnel which the applicant plans to hire. Not submitted and Whitlock did not question the missing documents
  6. The internal security plan must show that all off-duty law enforcement personnel to be used for internal security are POST-certified and have jurisdictional authority in the festival area. This would list names of each off duty officer. Not submitted. Whitlock did not question this missing documents. This means the permit holder must have submitted names to the city so the city could confirm the people held a law enforcement certificate? why wasn’t that list provided pursuant to the ORA request?
  7. The mayor and council are authorized to approve and issue a permit for a special event after considering all comments and conditions of the administrator or the reviewing departments and agencies as well as other information pertaining to the proposed event as described on the application. Whitlock intentionally failed to advise the city council the permit requirements were not complied with.
  8. Change churched declared on the permit application they expected over 2000 people and not one officer for security?
  9. A local Cafe had several events with around 100 people at each event and they were made to hire two off-duty officers for each event.
  10. Whitlock has long and personal relationship with the Chaplain at Change Church. Did he allow all the violations of the permit requirement to occur to save his friend the expense of hiring at least four off duty officers for the event. What could be the explanation. How unethical does Whitlock keep proving he is unfit for the job?
  11. This is the same person the chief schemed with to dress the person up as a police officer and gave him a marked police car and allowed to play policemen for the day.

Videos of great public interest

§ 16-10-1. Violation of Oath by Public Officer

Any public officer who willfully and intentionally violates the terms of his oath as prescribed by law shall, upon conviction thereof, be punished by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than five years.